Re: OT - Coulter

"trotsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Al Reid wrote:
> > "trotsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>
> >>Jerry McG wrote:
> >>
> >>>"trotsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Jerry McG wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>"trotsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Giftzwerg wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >>>>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>I can give you one.  But I think its more fun to see if you have
> >>>>>>>>>
> > the
> >
> >>>>>>>>>>brains to figure out that revised draft laws are working their
way
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>through
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>the congress, and this time they include a provision to draft
> >>>>>>>>>
> > women.
> >
> >>>>>>>>>Cite?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Just to shut both of you assholes up:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>><http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:s.00089:>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>><http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.00163:>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>This is a *Democratic* bill, you colossal idiot.  How the fuck does
a
> >>>>>>>silly little grandstand play by Charlie Rangel (D-NY) and Ernest
> >>>>>>>Hollings (D-SC) morph into *Bush's* plan to "draft women?"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Oh, are you saying Bush would veto it?  Here's another chance for
you
> >>>>>
> > to
> >
> >>>>>>lie, Shitzwerg.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Now our commie buddy trotsky has gonne from the usual leftist
delusion
> >>>>
> >>>to
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>leftist lunacy....it's Bush's scheme to enact a law to draft women,
> >>>>
> >>>which
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>was developed entirely by his political opposion to protest the Iraq
> >>>>
> >>>war.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>This is clearly the stupidest argument put yet forward by these
> >>>>>indoictrinated, leftist morons.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Please explain how asking you right wing dickheads a question
> >>>>constitutes an "argument."  Take as much time as you need.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You asked another question in the face of having again been completely
> >>>discredited and exposed as a typical lying, leftist hypocrite... take
as
> >>>much time as YOU need, shithead!
> >>
> >>
> >>I see what you mean: you're use of the word "argument" might've have
> >>been your Tourette's Syndrome acting up.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Here we go again, having to educate the left on the use of the English
> > language:
> >
> > Argument:  [n]  a fact or assertion offered as evidence that something
is
> > true.
> >
> > Now that you understand the word, is it ok to use it now?
>
>
>
> God are you guys stupid--how is asking a question an "argument"?

Very simple, dipshit, your argument was contained within your stupid,
deflecting question, which you then tried to side step by claiming it was
just a "question". Once again, the left thinks EVERYONE but them is
stupid...but, look who's out of power!