
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Harold Pinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Mark Steese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > Harold Pinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:l6yyb.1083128 > $be.157417 > > @news.easynews.com: > > > >>>> In general, Chuck is right. > >>> > >>> In general, Chuck is a pathetic shill, which is presumably what > >>> Disney hired him to be. > >> > >> He's far more successful than you'll ever be. > > > > This is true. I could never be the pathetic shill that Chuck is. > > > > > And you could never have his bank account. > > > > >> Whether you disagree with him, he speaks the truth. All the net- > >> nerds do is attack family movies. > > > > 'Scuse me, 'Harold,' but Chuck didn't say nothing 'bout no net-nerds. > > > > > I know. I did. > > > >>>> People (not just critics) are so hostile to family movies. > >>> > >>> Bullshit. "Elf" is going gangbusters at the box office and has over > >>> a hundred positive reviews at rottentomatoes.com. Where's the > >>> hostility? People love the damn thing. "Pirates of the Caribbean" > >>> was another family movie that was a huge hit with positive critical > >>> response, and "Finding Nemo" was the most popular movie of the year. > >> > >> Wow, 2 movies in the last 20 years. I don't count animation because > >> most people assume they are family movies and pretty much leave them > >> alone. > > > > Bullshit. If "net-nerds" don't like family movies on principle, > they'd > > be slamming animation just as much as live-action, *especially* Pixar > > animation. However, "net-nerds" dote on Pixar. > > > > > No, they leave animation alone because they don't expect much from them. > They are the in the domain of family films. ?.. you saying no one expects much from Pixar movies? > >>>> If a movie isn't edgy, or artistic or indie enough, people go > >>>> ballistic. > >>> > >>> Yeah, that's what people loved about "Finding Nemo" -- the edginess. > >> > >> They liked it because it was clearly understood to be a family movie. > >> In this country, that's all animation is (excluding South Park). try explaining that to American Fans of the multi-million dollar a year Anime industry. > > *Who* liked it? Aren't you the one who think people are hostile to > > family movies? > > > > > See the animation rule above. Try to stay with me on this. > > > > [snip] > >> Every Eddie Murphy movie released has made money, so I'm not sure > that > >> "everyone hated" them. > > > > How much money did "Pluto Nash" make, net-nerd? > > > > > It made much more than it cost to make. Eddie has the midas touch and > mvie studios know this, and this is why the net-nerds hate him. making more money than it costs to produce isn't a very subjective method of discerning whether or not a movie is critically "Good" or "Bad". i don't have a problem with Eddie Murphy, Family Movies, or Murphy IN Family Movies - just Murphy in BAD Family Movies; which "Haunted Mansion" happens to be. ob
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |