Re: OT - Coulter

Jerry McG wrote:
> "trotsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Giftzwerg wrote:
> >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > I can give you one.  But I think its more fun to see if you have the
> > > > > > brains to figure out that revised draft laws are working their way
> through
>
> > > > > > the congress, and this time they include a provision to draft women.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cite?
> > > >
> > > > Just to shut both of you assholes up:
> > > >
> > > > <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:s.00089:>
> > > >
> > > > <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.00163:>
> > >
> > >
> > > This is a *Democratic* bill, you colossal idiot.  How the fuck does a
> > > silly little grandstand play by Charlie Rangel (D-NY) and Ernest
> > > Hollings (D-SC) morph into *Bush's* plan to "draft women?"
> >
> >
> >
> > Oh, are you saying Bush would veto it?  Here's another chance for you to
> > lie, Shitzwerg.
>
>
> Now our commie buddy trotsky has gonne from the usual leftist delusion to
> leftist lunacy....it's Bush's scheme to enact a law to draft women, which
> was developed entirely by his political opposion to protest the Iraq war.
> This is clearly the stupidest argument put yet forward by these
> indoictrinated, leftist morons.


Please explain how asking you right wing dickheads a question 
constitutes an "argument."  Take as much time as you need.