Re: More info on the "global warming" scam

On 28 Nov 2003 14:38:21 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard) wrote:

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Megalithic) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> 
>> > Nothing more than a method to shift trillions of $'s to the Third
>> > World
>> > from the First.  Despite all the contrary evidence cropping up, the
>> > IPCC
>> >  STILL thinks they can predict climate out 100 years when the best
>> > computer
>> > models can't predict weather for a week.
>> 
>> Climate and weather are two different things genius. I don't need
>> scientists to tell me that the summers have been getting consistently
>> colder and wetter where I live, and it's common knowledge that all
>> other parts of the world have had definite climate change.
>> 
>> Regardless of the "debate" over climate change, reliance on fossil
>> fuels is an undeniably bad thing. Pollution is real, and you can take
>> a walk through cancer hospitals for proof. You can check out the long
>> list of extinct species for proof. You can read up on acid rain for
>> proof.
>> 
>> The only reason we aren't driving cars that get 80 miles per gallon on
>> gasoline, or driving hydrogen or alcohol powered cars is that the
>> money (ExxonMobil) goes into the right pockets (Bush.)
>> 
>> > 
>> > From the Guardian:
>> > 
>> > Middle Ages were warmer than today, say scientists By Robert Matthews,
>> > Science Correspondent(Filed: 06/04/2003) Claims that man-made
>> > pollution is causing "unprecedented" global warming have been
>> > seriously undermined by new research which shows that the Earth was
>> > warmer during the Middle Ages.From the outset of the global warming
>> > debate in the late 1980s, environmentalists have said that
>> > temperatures are rising higher and faster than ever before, leading
>> > some scientists to conclude that greenhouse gases from cars and power
>> > stations are causing these "record-breaking" global temperatures.
>> 
>> <bullshit snipped>
>> 
>> From the BBC:
>> 
>> The US pollutes more, absolutely and per head, than any other country
>> (it also produces more wealth). Its greenhouse emissions have risen by
>> more than 11% since 1990: its Kyoto commitment was to reduce them by
>> 6%. It is the only country to have signed the protocol and then to
>> have repudiated it. President Bush said in March the US would not
>> ratify Kyoto, because he thought it could damage the US economy and
>> because it does not yet require developing countries to cut their
>> emissions. His domestic and foreign critics think the US will lose
>> economically by staying aloof.
>> 
>> *end of article*
>> 
>> America is the largest polluter in the world. With 4 percent of the
>> world's population, it discharges a quarter of the world's carbon
>> dioxide. But President Bush did not hesitate to sabotage attempts to
>> agree the Kyoto Protocol. ExxonMobil led the oil lobby against the
>> Kyoto Protocol and fully supported and encouraged Bush's moves.
>> 
>> When George W. Bush talks about climate change and the Kyoto Protocol,
>> ExxonMobil's words come out of his mouth. And who's got their hand up
>> your back?
>
>Stupid retard.  You REALLY believe America is the biggest polluter when
>the @#$@@ Third World heats, cooks, travels using COMPLETElY unregulated
>and  dirty fuels.  That's 4 billion people dimbulb.
>-Rich

Fact - The US is the largest user of the world's resources.
Fact - The residuals of this use pollute.
Ergo - The US is the world's biggest polluter.

Fact - The US has the world's largest economy.
Fact - The US controls the largest portion of the world's output.
Ergo - The US causes pollution in all parts of the earth.  

Can you comprehend any of that? Or will you go thru life with your
head in the sand and your brain up your ass? I bet you didn't even
realize that more folks died because of Union Carbide's plant in India
than on 9/11. But who cares? They're just little brown Third Worlders.

WB Yeats