Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: More info on the "global warming" scam



[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Megalithic) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> 
> > Nothing more than a method to shift trillions of $'s to the Third
> > World
> > from the First.  Despite all the contrary evidence cropping up, the
> > IPCC
> >  STILL thinks they can predict climate out 100 years when the best
> > computer
> > models can't predict weather for a week.
> 
> Climate and weather are two different things genius. I don't need
> scientists to tell me that the summers have been getting consistently
> colder and wetter where I live, and it's common knowledge that all
> other parts of the world have had definite climate change.
> 
> Regardless of the "debate" over climate change, reliance on fossil
> fuels is an undeniably bad thing. Pollution is real, and you can take
> a walk through cancer hospitals for proof. You can check out the long
> list of extinct species for proof. You can read up on acid rain for
> proof.
> 
> The only reason we aren't driving cars that get 80 miles per gallon on
> gasoline, or driving hydrogen or alcohol powered cars is that the
> money (ExxonMobil) goes into the right pockets (Bush.)
> 
> > 
> > From the Guardian:
> > 
> > Middle Ages were warmer than today, say scientists By Robert Matthews,
> > Science Correspondent(Filed: 06/04/2003) Claims that man-made
> > pollution is causing "unprecedented" global warming have been
> > seriously undermined by new research which shows that the Earth was
> > warmer during the Middle Ages.From the outset of the global warming
> > debate in the late 1980s, environmentalists have said that
> > temperatures are rising higher and faster than ever before, leading
> > some scientists to conclude that greenhouse gases from cars and power
> > stations are causing these "record-breaking" global temperatures.
> 
> <bullshit snipped>
> 
> From the BBC:
> 
> The US pollutes more, absolutely and per head, than any other country
> (it also produces more wealth). Its greenhouse emissions have risen by
> more than 11% since 1990: its Kyoto commitment was to reduce them by
> 6%. It is the only country to have signed the protocol and then to
> have repudiated it. President Bush said in March the US would not
> ratify Kyoto, because he thought it could damage the US economy and
> because it does not yet require developing countries to cut their
> emissions. His domestic and foreign critics think the US will lose
> economically by staying aloof.
> 
> *end of article*
> 
> America is the largest polluter in the world. With 4 percent of the
> world's population, it discharges a quarter of the world's carbon
> dioxide. But President Bush did not hesitate to sabotage attempts to
> agree the Kyoto Protocol. ExxonMobil led the oil lobby against the
> Kyoto Protocol and fully supported and encouraged Bush's moves.
> 
> When George W. Bush talks about climate change and the Kyoto Protocol,
> ExxonMobil's words come out of his mouth. And who's got their hand up
> your back?

Stupid retard.  You REALLY believe America is the biggest polluter when
the @#$@@ Third World heats, cooks, travels using COMPLETElY unregulated
and  dirty fuels.  That's 4 billion people dimbulb.
-Rich



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.