
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Gandalf falling scene, pro/con (was Re: ROTK news about Saruman's scenes - SPOILERS)
- __From__: Calvin Rice
- __Subject__: Re: Gandalf falling scene, pro/con (was Re: ROTK news about Saruman's scenes - SPOILERS)
- __Date__: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:31:45 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (zosdad) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> ...
> I really don't get the ultra-literalist opinion. ...
In the full context of the thread, I said that this scene didn't matter much
for its changes. I'll give you the no-cliffhanger-resolved point. But my
main complaints are not at the level of this scene. They're at another level
entirely. But whenever I mention some smaller change, people like you start
hammering on the small stuff while excusing yourselves for letting PJ's big
changes get by.
-cr
- Re: ROTK news about Saruman's scenes - SPOILERS, (continued)
- Re: ROTK news about Saruman's scenes - SPOILERS,
Calvin Rice
- Re: ROTK news about Saruman's scenes - SPOILERS,
RufusTFirefly
- Re: ROTK news about Saruman's scenes - SPOILERS,
jere7my tho?rpe
- Re: ROTK news about Saruman's scenes - SPOILERS,
Calvin Rice
- Gandalf falling scene, pro/con (was Re: ROTK news about Saruman's scenes - SPOILERS),
zosdad
- Re: ROTK news about Saruman's scenes - SPOILERS,
jere7my tho?rpe
- Re: Gandalf falling scene, pro/con (was Re: ROTK news about Saruman's scenes - SPOILERS),
Calvin Rice
- Re: Gandalf falling scene, pro/con (was Re: ROTK news about Saruman's scenes - SPOILERS),
Calvin Rice
- Re: Gandalf falling scene, pro/con,
Steve Fine
- Re: Gandalf falling scene, pro/con,
Calvin Rice
- Re: Gandalf falling scene, pro/con,
R. Cohen