Re: ABC News Declares "JFK shot himself"

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 Mike1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick) wrote:
> 
> >> >Have you read "Case Closed"?
> >> 
> >> Why should I read propaganda?
> >
> >I appreciate your honesty in acknowledging you haven't read it. I
> >didn't think so.
>
> Perhaps you could distill the book for me: Explain to me what it has to 
> say regarding the Warren Commission's released photographs of a pristine 
> magic bullet featuring six rifling grooves when the rifle allegedly used 
> in the crime only had four rifling grooves.

I don't recall whether the book says anything about that or not, but I'd 
rather like to know your source for CE 399 (the designated WC exhibit 
which is the bullet we're talking about) having "six" grooves & the 
rifle itself had only "four."  We must first establish that this 
discrepancy even truly exists before we can establish that this is 
anything the book even *needed* to address.

And CE 399 was hardly "pristine"; that assertion has been corrected 
several times in this thread.

> If the book does not address the issue, then I await with amusement your 
> explanation as to why it should nevertheless be worth my time.

OIC, so if it doesn't address just that one single issue, even though 
there's a great deal more to the assassination than just that, nothing 
else of the myriad points in the book is worth reading?  If the book is 
remiss in failing to discuss just that one aspect of the assassination 
out of many, everything that *is* discussed in it must automatically be 
invalid?

-- 
"During the school year I am a teacher, but during June & July I am a CIA
operative." - me, on 6-11-03.