Re: Misunderstanding

"Catherine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> "george maloney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Catherine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > "george maloney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > "Catherine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > > "george maloney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > bill turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <SNIP>
> <snip>
> 
> > > (Interesting how very well people are using EVERYONE these days.  In speaking,
>  that's
> > > "all caps EVERYONE".)
> >
> > I do it to mock you honey. Catch a wave.
> > >
> <snip>
> 
> See below.
> 
> > > Who is being attacked?  And how?  And why would people "flame" someone in order
>  to
> > > stand up for (they feel is) the right thing?
> >
> > Who indeed. 'cause it's fun?
> > >
> <snip>
> 
> See below.
> 
> > > Personally, I don't do things because people are my friends - although I might be
> > > more (or less) motivated to do so because of the emotions and greater familiarity
> > > with the situation.  I do things because I believe them to be the right things to
>  do
> > > or say.  I don't have different standards of decency and belief and action based
>  upon
> > > my relationships with people.
> >
> > Sad. Maybe you should find more people you can trust to be your
> > friends.
> 
> So "friends" under your definition are people who will lie for you?  I don't see how
> you can state what you just did based upon what I wrote - unless you mean that unless
> someone is willing to "drive the Bronco" for you, they aren't your friends.  I 'spose
> that people who regularly do EVERYTHING and continue to do such things have to
> require that.  Sad.

No my dear, I don't expect my friends to lie for me. I never said
that. They don't have to lie for me. Your reading skills suck. Read
above again and look for the word lie. It's not there. SEE. OMG! Now
OJ is involved. Where's the other glove? Let me know if you find
it.HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA "drive the Bronco"
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Psst... check under your bed.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > > If that's the case, you could have simply reiterated
> > > RchSk7's SHUT the FUCK UP rather than trying to
> > > appear more reasonable.
> >
> > Listening to you speak of reason is funny.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> You are either nothing more than a troll - and proud of being one - or you are a
> liar.  I feel sorry for you, but it's necessary to detail what the DCI success track
> leads to.

Wow. Now i'm a troll and a liar. Why 'cause I like to toy with you,
call you on and give you back some of the crap you dish out? Don't
feel sorry for me, i'm doing just fine.
DCI success track? What has that got to do with you opening your mouth
and stirring the shit about people and events you know nothing
about(see original thread)? How did DCI become part of a post about
DCA folks? Stay focused.

> 
> Am also glad to see <not> that EVERYONE has now determined that the more pertinent
> questions which made this a RAMD - and not a particular corps' - issue after all are
> being neglected in favor of yet another attempt to make this all about my existence
> and expression of my personal opinions which are threatening to EVERYONE's fraud.

I can't speak for anyone else. I never do. That's your job. As in
"EVERYONE" "EVERYTHING" etc... You are the one who makes it all about
you and your agenda. It seems to be what you live or at least type
for. I don't think you threaten "EVERYONE" but I can only speak for
myself so no i'm not threatened. What fraud?

> Thanks for helping to detail that EVERYONE feels they can do EVERYTHING they wish,
> despite any claims or requests to the contrary.
> 
> Of course, if flaming me really were merely fun and entertainment and my posts
> meaningless, and nothing more, I find it interesting that such is so much more
> important to you than all the (allegedly) vehement requests to get this thread to be
> over.

Yes. I agree with you. This should end. So after this reply I will let
you have the last word and I will stop. It has been fun and
entertaining, but we seem to be getting nowhere. All good things
must......
> 
> You can dismiss it as paranoia, as you wish.  But if you truly believed that, your
> way of dealing with it only signifies (at best) stupidity and mediocrity, and at
> worst - proof of EVERYTHING I criticize.

 Paraniod, stupid, mediocre proof of EVERYTHING. I can live with that
summarization. Thanks.
George;}