
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (paghat) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sad that > the magic of the name "Arkham House" has faded with time, & Turner turning > them into a science fiction publisher started the decline of fannish > devotion to the imprint, which is not to say Jim didn't select some > awfully nice sci-fi. <snip> > The magic names for devottees of weird tales nowadays are Ash Tree, > Tartarus, & Sarob. > > -paghat the ratgirl Hi Paghat, I didn't realize Arkhams had fallen in repute so far. I would agree partially with your statements above, except that I still think Arkhams from its "golden age" (1939-48) are wonderful books with huge historical interest. I would particularly cite "Skullface" and "Dark Carnival" as two of the premier fantasy publications of all time. Best, Charles Cunningham
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |