
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Charlie Foxtrot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On 03 Dec 2003 16:02:35 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (VARTOX) wrote: > > >Charlie Foxtrot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >>Well, Lynne, if you're not trying to pull our collective legs and this > >>is for real, you would be guilty of knowingly accepting stolen > >>property. > > > >Maybe. Circumstantial evidence would seem to indicate so, but there's not > >enough direct evidence to prove that the added item was stolen. > > > If the incident were reported, I'm sure that inventory checks would > indicate if the area from which this was shipped had incured any odd > fluctuations in the theft rate. ROFL! Yeah, sure.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |