Re: Comics: Too risque and political agenda?

Jim Longo wrote  wrote:

: The question, though, is where you draw the line.

Of course.

: But I have to question how timely and relevant it is for me to know
: the exact sexual positions two characters (of any orientation) use, or
: for characters using language that seems totally out of character for
: them, merely for the sake of being "edgy" or "kewl".

Yes, but I'm not sure what that has to do with the topic at hand.  This guy has
something against gay characters and left-wing sentiments in comics, for
chrissakes.  I'm terribly sorry, but anybody who entertains that kind of
thinking in the here and now *is* a buffoon -- and that's actually the nicest
word for them I can think of.

-- 
Marc-Oliver Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Even Alan Moore himself ran screaming from this kind of story and began an
ungainly, 15-year long attempt to reinvent himself as me.  So why anyone would
look to the awkward pomposity of mid-'80s comics for inspiration is baffling."
  --Grant Morrison

--
[Please note: This is a Usenet message, originally posted to the
rec.arts.comics.* groups.  If you see it in a moderated or censored forum, it
was copied there without my consent.]