
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Jim Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : Johanna Draper Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> didst : say unto the masses... :> Catwoman #25 :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> Catwoman #25 :> Writer: Ed Brubaker :> Artists: Paul Gulacy & Jimmy Palmiotti :> DC Comics, 40 color pages, $2.50 :> :> If you thought Benes' BIRDS were bad, then stay far away from the new :> artistic direction on this title. The only thing that stands out from :> the murky pages is the artists' fascination with Catwoman's boobs and :> butt. Of particular distastefulness is the quarter-page sequence staring :> at her naked silhouetted crotch. Even beyond the sexism, no one looks :> like they should any more, and the story gets lost in the poor panel :> choices. :> :> It's a tried-and-true desperate approach for a female-led superhero :> comic: when sales aren't what the company wants, goose the :> objectification level. However, this isn't even attractive, it's just :> sleazy. It's also not likely to work, since the existing audience is :> smart enough to be turned off by the tactic, and it's not salacious :> enough to attract new readers to make up for them. It's a shame the book :> has to be sacrificed to teaching the publisher the lesson that times :> have changed and strategies need to change with them. Adult readers :> looking for stylish noir expect female leads to be more than blow-up :> dolls. : OTOH, Robert Mitchum as Slam Bradley is bloody inspired. I really don't see any way that Gulacy can be lumped into the same camp as Balent. Shawn
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |