Re: who's hotter wonder woman or hawkgirl?

"Brian Doyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 

> 
> "Janus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> lord zog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>
>> > Brian Doyle wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Janus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > "Brian Doyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> >>
>> >> > No matter how hard she works the rest of her body, if she can't
>> >> > move her legs her glutes become flabby.
>> >>
>> >> They can move, it's just that Babs can't move them volutarily.
>> >> Surely there are exercise machines capable of moving the muscle
>> >> groups for her?
>> >
>> If a machine does the movement, her glutes won't be exercised.
> 
> If the muscles are moving, why not? The fact the motive power comes
> from an external stimulus like a machine rather than her internal
> nervous system, what difference does that make to the muscles
> themselves? They are moving => they are being exercised. Not as
> efficiently as the muscles themselves would, but still being
> exercised. 

It seems to me that there is a difference between moving and being moved.  
I find it hard to beleive that the machine could expend the energy and you 
would get the results.

And if this works, why aren't health clubs filled with exercise machines 
that move your muscles for you.  I'm sure they'd be a lot more popular if 
you didn't have to actually do anything but sit there and let a machine do 
the work.