Re: In Defense Of Continuity

 "dpeattie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Strangely enough, I did, too. I wondered why they bothered to raise the
> > question if they weren't going to really answer it.
> 
> That *does* surprise me.  From your expressed opinions so far, I'd have
> thought you'd take such a thing in stride and even laugh about it.

I did. But I still think, in the long run, it errs a bit too much on the 
"making fun of fans" side. 
 
> > I wouldn't hold my breath. Especially since I don't think the title
> > itself is doing as well as hoped.
> 
> Really?  My impression was that the current CATWOMAN book is one of DC's
> more well-received ones.  

I'm not encouraged by the recent art change, and I'm even less 
encouraged by the number of people who've said they're dropping it as a 
result. It remains to be seen if they will, of course, and whether 
enough new readers will come in to cover them. But I don't have a good 
feeling about this.

-- 
Johanna Draper Carlson             
Reviews of Comics Worth Reading -- http://www.comicsworthreading.com
Newly updated: December Previews, Colonia is the new Comic Worth 
   Reading, Reviews of Catwoman, Teen Titans Go!, Noble Causes,
   Johnny Dollar, Komikwerks, Don't Eat the Electric Sheep