
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Michael S. Morris wrote: > Sure. It's one of that class of books that I've read, > burned passionately in favour of for a month or two, > and then sobered up. The character of these > books is that they advance a single startling thesis that > tries to explain a whole lot of everything. Other examples > for me have been Erich von Daniken's _Chariots of the > Gods_ and Jared Diamond's _Guns, Germs, and Steel_. > > The problems with each of these books become apparent > when one starts being skeptical. It took me about > two months to get over Jaynes. I do not now believe he reads > Homer even remotely correctly. I thought it was the bicameronian mind, and another example of how the Scots orginiated everything. I think the only book that affected me like that was _Human, All too Human_, if one will allow that we're too human is a startly thesis. And of course no amount of skepticism can dislodge that one. D. Latane
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |