
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, francis muir wrote: > On 11/30/03 5:48 PM, in article > [EMAIL PROTECTED], "David E. Latane" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, francis muir wrote: > > > >>> Socially acceptable, I presume, to aristocrats and gentry? Men of genuine > >>> accomplishment who made their own living in the professions were in fact > >>> socially acceptable to all but the hardest of the snobs early in the > >>> nineteenth century. > >> > >> Tell that to Tommy Lipton. > > > > Sir Tommie, famous for losing the America's Cup? I doubt he was snubbed > > because of his closeness to the greasy till--I'd rather think it was for > > foisting another dastardly Scottish invention onto the English--the > > teabag--and providing more ammunition for "Wha's Like Us?" teatowels. > > 1) Lipton was Thomas or Tommy; never Tommie. > 2) Lipton never lost the America's Cup, chifly because he never held it. > 3) The tea-bag was invented after Lipton's demise. > 4) The teabag is an American not a Scottish invention. > > Otherwise you were spot on. > > I seem to be in the presence of an old Liptonian. Didn't the Scots invent everything? Next you'll be telling me that Sir Thomas didn't start the World Cup. Can http://www.rampantscotland.com be wrong? D. Latane
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |