
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 11/30/03 9:16 AM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "David E. Latane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Meg Worley wrote: > >> >> Drewdr writes: >>> Going by period literature, when exactly did it become socially >>> acceptable to work for a living and make your own fortune, as opposed >>> to inheriting land and living on rent/annuities ? >> >> Later than the 19th century, at least -- trade is a big issue in >> *Howard's End*, and that's just pre-Great War. Even today, your >> question is underdetermined; there are still people for whom it isn't >> socially acceptable to make one's own money. After all, isn't that >> what we're all *really* scandalized about in l'affaire de Paris Hilton? > > Socially acceptable, I presume, to aristocrats and gentry? Men of genuine > accomplishment who made their own living in the professions were in fact > socially acceptable to all but the hardest of the snobs early in the > nineteenth century. Tell that to Tommy Lipton.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |