Re: The Circus of Dr. Lao

On 11/17/03 9:32 AM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Janet Puistonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:30:30 GMT, "Janet Puistonen"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> <<He was allegedly implicated in the JFK assassination (and I believe
>> it's true).>>
>> 
>> I've heard a lot of JFK assasination theories, but this is the first time
>> I've heard THAT one! (Who thought it up, the John BIrch Soiety?)
> 
> I'm not sure offhand, but I think not.  Would it prejudice your belief
> if it were someone in the JBS?  What if they had proof, would that
> make any difference?  Is your mind made up regardless of the source or
> the facts?  I'm not a member of JBS, but I have read items by a
> current president - he seemed like a very informed individual to me.
> The originator of the JBS (MacDonald?) was killed in Korean flight
> 700(?) - the one that was shot down over communist territory.
> 
> It's very wrongheaded to dismiss implications based upon sources you
> know nothing about.  That comes from intelligence gathering by peer
> pressure.  It does not speak well of one's integrity and character.
> --
> Howard>>
> 
> Gosh, Howard, you've managed to leap all the way from my possibly taking
> material hostile to a prominent Democrat from a very right-wing source with
> a grain of salt to my supposed lack of integrity and character?
> 
> You know what? Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

Hm. You know, Janet, you may want to rethink how you write
up messages. From my perspective it appears that you have
just exhorted yourself to get fucked together with the geegee
you rode in on.