
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... [snip] > > The end of history meant the end of the jihad against everyone. The > west was seen to have won. It reigned supreme, with no challengers on > the horizon. Well, pretty much. A millenium ago (plus or minus quite a lot, actually) there came a split in ultimate philosophy. To put it in religious terms, the Islamic world decided that God could be squeezed between two pieces of pasteboard, and that the people who did that were to be put in charge of everything; the West decided that God's Creation was greater than any single piece of it, particularly the odd-shaped bits forming any given book, and set out to investigate that Creation in detail. As it turns out, it's much more difficult to forge, say, Jupiter or the Dirac Equations than it is to forge an angel's directives. The result has been that the West has been conspicuously successful, and the Dar al Islam has not. Certainly a culture that cannot even manufacture the explosives it uses to blow up children (including its own) is unlikely to provide a serious threat to one that puts things in orbit without worrying about collisions with coffins. The Western culture that resulted from Objectivism reigns supreme, challenged only by those other cultures that adopt some similar ruling philosophy. Our dealings with Islam are rather similar to our dealings with cockroaches -- unpleasant, and we may not care for the methods required and are always searching for ways with fewer side effects, but even if they crawl over the butter it won't keep us from being fed regularly. Regards, Ric
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |