
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:57:26 -0600, Carl F Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Öjevind Lång wrote: >> >> I can't speak on the matter of John Garth's book, but I think >> Carpenter is quite right when he says that we need a biography of >> Tolkien that is not "polite" - not a muckraking book, but one that >> simply admits that even the sun has spots; > > I'm not aware that anyone claims Tolkien was without flaws -- not even > Carpenter's authorized biography portrays such a man -- and Tolkien > himself would have been the last to do so. The question is whether those > flaws are anyone else's business, or in any way inform his work -- which, > after all, is the reason we care about Tolkien at all. > > And beyond this question, I quite disagree that anyone "needs" such a > biography: some may want it, but the Tolkien family is not obliged to > satisfy desires simply because they exist, nor is anyone entitled to > have their whims fulfilled. I quite agree. This ridiculous addiction to ruffling about in a celebrity's proverbial undergarments drawer is pathetic. -- Aaron Clausen tao_of_cow/\alberni.net (replace /\ with @) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |