
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 07:02:03 -0800, MasterDebater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Yuk Tang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Erm, the US actively worked to deprive Britain of her Empire.
>
>I am interested in continuing this subthread only if we can resist this
>unrealistic pro-British, anti-American attitude. Britain lost her Empire
>without any help from the US, and any other line of reasoning is, in my
>opinion, quite biased.
The US _did_ actively work to deprive Britain of her Empire, and to
supplant her position in the world economic order.
Remember Breton Woods.
--
Widespread possession of guns is justified by considerations of public
safety, individual dignity and healthy democracy. Public safety because
law enforcement personnel can never be numerous enough to guarantee
safety. (Remember this test: Call for a cop, an ambulance and a
pizza. Which will get there first?) Personal dignity implies, among much
else, readiness for self-defense. And the health of democratic culture
is implicated in the general public's involvement in public safety. This
is so because freedom is not a gift from government, and defending it
is not a duty that properly responsible citizens will entirely delegate
to government.
- George F. Will
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |