Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Awwwww, dammit...




On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Michael Lo wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Animeg3282) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Michael Lo said
> >
> > >Just read your blog a bit and about your questions on Better Luck Tomorrow,
> > >well I never saw the movie but here's the spiel:
> >
> > >
> > >-Cocaine is psychologically addictive far more than it's physically
> > >addictive,
> > >opiates on the other hand have a physical addiction that matches it's
> > >psychological addiction
> > >
> >
> > Oh. Maybe I was thinking of crack instead.
> >
>
> Maybe, crack is a cocaine derivative but it's mixed with a lot
> of other substances to cut it and it's used differently.  If I
> remember correctly crack has a strong physical addiction

Here's the shtick: Heroin, and other opiates are extremely , extremely
physically addictive.  so much so that going off of them can kill you
(that's why they developed heroin in the first place).

Crack is still pretty bad about being physically additive, but not nearly
so bad.

Lena



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.