
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Peter Van Huffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Fata Morgana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > "S.t.A.n.L.e.E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > >> To call manga 'Japanese comics' is like calling a painting > >> by Michelangelo a picture. Both are true statements and both > >> are utterly insufficient and degrading. > > > > Pshaw. There's nothing insignificant or degrading about the word 'comic.' > > > > Fata Morgana > > Please *read* the original statement, before replying in such a way. > Nowhere has been said that "comic" is degrading or insignificant. I misread the word "insufficient", but the word "degrading" does indeed appear in the statement. Which is all beside the point - it's still pretentious to think that Japanese comics are somehow ultimately so superior to American ones that they need an entirely new word to describe them. The ONLY reason I use the word manga in place of 'Japanese comic' is that it's more terse. > > I'll give you a hint: it's not because we think "comics" as a word or as a > genre are insignificant. > How old are you? As I said before, there's nothing degrading or insufficient about the word "comic." To demand that we don't call them comics is like demanding that we come up with a new word for "film" in reference to Japanese cinema, since "Seven Samurai" and "Ran" are obviously *so much more* than films. By saying that, you're basically ignoring all the American comics that are superior to the dreck surrounding them. More importantly, you're ignoring the exceedlingly high amount of manga that is pure dreck. Most manga sucks ass; as do most American comics. Remember Sturgeon's Law. Fata Morgana -- http://www.jazzmess.com - a veiwers' guide to Cowboy Bebop http://www.cowboybebop.org - archive of CowboyBebop.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |