Re: Awwwww, dammit...

"sanjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Blade wrote:
> > "sanjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> >> Which are almost as bad as anti-fans who bitch about fans every time
> >> they get a chance, just to prove how enlightened they are.  Do you
> >> mind if I call you Jim Taggart?
> >
> > Tell me, Ken.  If one thread equals "bitching about fans every time
> > they get a chance", where do you rank the people who start, say,
> > anti-dub or anti-Viz threads?
>
> About on the same level.  Maybe I jumped on Craxton's case a bit early,
but
> I seem to recall that he's pulled the "fashionably anti-fanboy" act a few
> times before.  That's no better than the "Dubs r evil, no matter whut"
> crowd.
>

First off, I do not bitch about this "every chance I get". I ignore it most
of the time, in fact. But when something like three different threads on the
subject pop up at the same time, I feel a need to make my own voice heard.

Second, I am not "fashionably" anti-fanboy. You may call me
"idealistically", or, if you're feeling mean, "zealously" anti-purist, but
the allegation that I hold these views purely because they are trendy within
my own social clique is not only false, but putrescently so.

                                                -Lord Craxton