Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: RS Berlin Classic vs. AquaC Urchin skimmer?



You should see the Remora Pro w/ Mag 5 in my son's 29g. <grin>

Marc


Dragon Slayer wrote:

> agreed that the HOB are unsightly, but if you don't have a sump it's about
> your only choice.  and the Pro versions with the Mag 3 in tank do hog up a
> good bit of space in the tank and create an eye sore.
>
> kc
>
> "Chimera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > How ugly is tht to look at ?
> > A mag3 in the tank and a smelly/noisy skimmer to look at?
> >
> > I'd rather use the sump if possible. That way I am not staying awake
> > at night worrying about a leak/overflow.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > "Dragon Slayer" <koi_man(nospam)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > sense you dont have room in the sump for the urchin pro, how about the
> > > remora pro w/ mag 3 HOB of your tank?
> > >
> > >
> > > kc
> > >
> > >
> > > "Chimera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > I have a 72g bow with a small (~6g) sump.
> > > > The tank has been neglected for the past year- never really got the
> > > > reef going past a couple of mushrooms and polyps.
> > > > Looking to revitalize it now as the  d i v o r c e  finalizes....
> > > >
> > > > I've been thinking about buying an Urchin skimmer (not Pro- don't have
> > > > the cabinet clearance) to replace my CPR counter current model.
> > > >
> > > > I've been offered a used Berlin Classic skimmer for $50 (no pump).
> > > > This skimmer has a much higher capacity rating (250g) vs the Urchin
> > > > (75g).
> > > >
> > > > My thinking (in no particular order) is like so:
> > > >
> > > > *Berlin:  Cheap- (good)
> > > >           higher rated capacity (good)
> > > >           Need a Mag7 in my sump (bad: noise/power/heat)
> > > >           Some bad/mediocre reviews (bad)
> > > >           Somewhat larger footprint (bad)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *Urchin:  More expensive (bad)
> > > >           Pushing rated capacity (bad)
> > > >           Uses small MaxiJet1200 (good)
> > > >           Excellent/good reviews (good)
> > > >           small footprint (good)
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have a recommendation for me given the above concerns (or
> > > > any others)?
> > > >
> > > > TIA.
> > > >
> > > > 72g AGA Bow/stand
> > > > 6g sump w/QuietOne return
> > > > Aiptasia
> > > > 36# LR
> > > > 4x96w DIY PC
> > > > Aiptasia
> > > > Halimeda

--
Personal Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com/oanda/index.html
Business Page:     http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
Marine Hobbyist:   http://www.melevsreef.com





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.