Re: Shades of the Petswarehouse Lawsuit!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert H) wrote:

>If you bought their product and expressed dis satisfaction,
>that would be different, but none of you have done that.

No, we've just pointed out that their marketing information sounds a
lot like psuedo-science (opinion), that their grammar skills are
horrible (true), and point out where NASA (to whom EcoAqualizer
attributes it's technology) has dismissed the alleged magical
properties of far infrared bioceramics.

>The Pets whse thing IS different. Complaining of bad service is not 
>slander.

Not that it made a difference to the people who Novak sued.


--
www.ericschreiber.com