Re: Origin and mark

In rec.antiques  Colonel Blink The Short Sighted Gink  wrote:

>In message  Ronnie McKinley 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>Interesting with all that security and you STILL archive your Usenet
>>post at Google. May I ask why do you continue to archive at Google?

>I know, I know. But Google is too useful
>

>Most genuine apologies if you find this post offensive. Doing a search 
>on Netscan on your name I found to be quite a tacky experience -rather 
>like peeping through someone's bedroom curtains. It is not my business 
>whether you post to news:rec.audio or just as it is not any of your 
>business if I post to news:alt.tennis_shorts.


I would say reading rec.audio would indeed be a 'tacky' experience.
I think you deliberately missed the uk. from that ng, yes?

I didn't suggest being not achieved at Google would in anyway make
one invisible. I'm aware one can search on the web, or search Google
with keywords and/or quotes etc., Doesn't take huge brainpower just
a bit of effort. Considering you asked me some time ago why I didn't
achieve at Google any longer, and  at the time you seemed to accept
and appreciate the reasons I gave. So I was merely asking!!

Anyways, thanks for the Sherlock Holmes party trick. Gad!! but that
Holmes fella would have been the devil had he had the computer and a
dial-up connection.






-- 
Ronnie