Re: White Identity

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mk_2802) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> White Identity
> by Kevin Alfred Strom
> 
> Listen to audio at: http://www.natall.com/internet-radio/ts/060703.mp3
> 
> American Dissident Voices Broadcast of June 7, 2003
> 
> Welcome to American Dissident Voices. I'm Kevin Alfred Strom.
> 
> If we are going to survive, that means that we have to decide who "we"
> are. That's so basic, so obvious, so essential that it's amazing how
> few people give much thought to it.
> 
> The Blacks have very little trouble deciding who they are. They know
> at a glance. Anyone of largely sub-Saharan African ancestry, who has
> the requisite dark complexion, kinky hair, and broad nose and thick
> lips qualifies. They don't much care whether the individual in
> question believes in Catholicism, Pentecostalism, the AME Church, or
> is a follower of Louis Farrakhan or an indigenous African religion.
> They don't much care if the person is a Marxist or a free-market
> entrepreneur. As much as individual Blacks may care about such things,
> race trumps all. What they really care about is the fact that the
> person in question is Black. It's a question of racial survival. Race
> has to trump all. It is of the essence.
> 
> Similarly, the Nation of Aztlan folks are deeply concerned for their
> race's survival. They know who they are and where they came from. They
> value their racial characteristics and demand that they have a future.
> They demand territory -- exclusive territory -- so their race can have
> food and living space and self-government. They don't, to my
> knowledge, define themselves through religion. So therefore the
> differences between the Catholic and indigenous religions practiced by
> members of their race do not fracture their racial unity, nor does
> religious conversion serve to pollute their gene pool. They may differ
> on economics and on the ideal social structure they'd like to see in
> the new nation they intend to carve out of the United States. But they
> all agree that they need to carve out that nation -- and they all
> agree that that nation will belong to their race and their race alone.
> That's essential. Everything else is debatable. Racial identity is
> paramount. They are a race which intends to survive.
> 
> Similarly, East Asian peoples have a very strong sense of peoplehood.
> Their communities at home, and in the countries they colonize overseas
> like the United States and Canada, are close to being racially pure.
> They maintain their racial integrity, and there is a vanishingly small
> percentage of non-Asian mmigration to their homelands. They know who
> they are. With almost no exceptions, they define themselves in terms
> of ancestry -- reverence for one's ancestors is a powerful tradition
> among Asians -- and the genetic integrity of their nations is secure.
> 
> But ask a few White Americans or Europeans to define their people --
> to define who "we" are -- and you will get such a mass of
> contradictory answers that you'll quickly give up on getting any
> consistent answer to your question. You'll probably get more rational
> answers from other races if you ask them to define who "we" are. They
> have long and quite rationally regarded the White West as a racial and
> cultural unity.
> 
> Part of White confusion about who we are is no doubt due to the
> omnipresent propaganda of the Jewish-controlled media and educational
> establishments, which says that "race does not exist," that racial
> mixing is desirable, and that White identity is the sine qua non of
> all evil in the world. This propaganda undoubtedly does real damage to
> White psyches, and to innocent young White souls. And the promoters of
> such propaganda deserve whatever measures it takes to stop their
> hateful lies. But their propaganda does not fully explain the
> confusion of Whites about their racial identity.
> 
> Part of the confusion about our identity is religious in nature.
> 
> In the dying days of the majestic Classical civilization created by
> our race, the indigenous religion of that civilization was defeated,
> destroyed, and supplanted by Christianity, which had originally sprung
> from Jewish roots, and then spread among the slave population to the
> increasingly cosmopolitan and proletarian citizenry. In a few
> centuries, Christianity became the state religion of Rome. When
> healthier White tribes from the north invaded and eventually occupied
> Rome, many were undoubtedly awed by the culture, technology,
> architecture, and monumental art of the defeated Empire. They
> mistakenly associated these great achievements of our race with the
> recently-adopted religion of Christianity, and naturally the Pontifex
> Maximus, or chief Christian priest or Pope of Rome, anxious to
> preserve the wealth and power of his institution, did not disabuse
> them of this misconception. Thus many Whites, overawed by the remnants
> of Rome's grandeur and greatness, were converted to a belief in what
> they thought was the god of Rome.
> 
> In addition to these sincere conversions, there were other sincere
> conversions based on a true belief in the Westernized Christian
> doctrines eventually preached all over Europe; or on the qualities the
> Christians' Bible, which, unlike the more poetic and fanciful
> Classical or related Nordic myths, claimed to be an accurate
> historical record of events that actually happened in the real world.
> And it is commonplace knowledge that many conversions were made by the
> sword, and that thousands were killed who would not submit.
> 
> Thus it was that Christianity achieved what no other religion had done
> before. It brought all Europe and almost all of our race under one
> religion -- a remarkable achievement, which had many benefits, not the
> least of which was a realization of cultural unity and a doctrinal
> basis to unite all White tribes against common racial enemies, who
> naturally also had alien religions. It was under the banner of
> Christianity that Charles Martel defeated the Moslems at Tours and
> that the Moors were finally expelled from Europe by the troops of
> Ferdinand and Isabella.
> 
> With geographic Europe, and racial Europe, almost universally
> Christian, Europe became Christendom. And, for all practical purposes,
> the White race thought of itself as Christendom. And, although in a
> diminished sense, many of us still think that way today. Even in White
> nationalist circles, where our sense of racial identity must be
> strongest if we are to lead our people to freedom and security, we
> find such thinking is very common.
> 
> Even Lawrence Brown, author of the thought-provoking work The Might of
> the West, defined "us" as the descendants of those who were Catholic
> in 1492, with some additions, also Christian.
> 
> It's hard not to be emotionally moved by the racially healthy aspects
> of Christian ritual and culture: the all-White children's choir
> singing Mozart's Introitus Requiem or the intensely spiritual works of
> Bach or Handel; the magnificent Gothic cathedral or the white country
> church at the foot of the mountain; the upright moral folk who peopled
> the vastness of the American plains and made the greatest Republic in
> history. I am moved by these things myself.
> 
> But these things are in their essence more White than they are
> Christian. Without the White race, they could never have existed, even
> if Christianity had taken root among other races. The source of
> Mozart's music and the vast Gothic temples was not in doctrine, not in
> scripture, but in the genes. That is one reason we must define
> ourselves in racial terms -- in genetic terms -- or we and everything
> we built and everything we love will die.
> 
> That is why White Christians must put race first, above even their
> beloved religion. They must agree with other White nationalists that
> what we are is White, what we are is the European race, what we are is
> defined in biological terms and that what we are fighting for is the
> survival of that racial heritage and the culture that our race created
> and that it alone can sustain and move forward to its destiny. Race
> comes first. Race is how we must define ourselves. Whites of other
> religions are still "us." Non-Whites, even if they share our religious
> beliefs, can never be "us." Any other approach is suicide.
> 
> Defining ourselves in broad religious terms only means that either 1)
> Koreans and Jews, et cetera, who convert to our religion are "us" too
> or 2) that most Mexicans, for example, are "us" now.
> 
> That's giving up the game, lying down, and accepting racial death. If
> a few part-Whites survive someday who practice Christianity, that's
> defeat. Not victory.
> 
> Our race not only existed before Christianity existed -- making it
> impossible for that to be our defining characteristic -- but we
> existed before any known religion came into being.
> 
> Before Darwin and Mendel and Crick and Watson, we may not have known
> our distant history or the physical mechanism behind our identity as
> Whites. Before the rise of Jewish power in the 20th century, we may
> not have seen clearly that the Jews are a profoundly alien intrusion
> into our nations.
> 
> But the United States Congress in 1790 did make being "a free White
> person" a requirement for becoming a citizen of the United States, a
> legal requirement which remained in force for 162 years. They saw what
> was essential, and acted on it. They had an implicit White racial
> consciousness that was made explicit in the laws of the land.
> 
> Unfortunately, they had no conception of the non-White nature of the
> Jew, and that was the one flaw that allowed the mass immigration of
> Jews in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. And that alien (and
> racially conscious of its alienness) group proceeded to use all of its
> cleverness and all of its wealth to destroy the nascent racial
> consciousness of Whites and to erase the laws of our forefathers which
> protected our race from non-White immigration and intermarriage. Some
> have argued that identifying ourselves as Christians might have
> prevented the mistake of considering Jews to be White and so allowing
> them free access to our society, but I do not agree with that
> position. As in Spain 500 years ago, Jews could just have themselves
> sprinkled with 'holy water' and claim to believe in the right
> doctrine, and the religious barrier could be easily overcome. And
> furthermore, the Jewish connection to Christianity has most often
> worked in the Jews' favor, making religious and secular Christian
> leaders alike view them with misplaced sympathy.
> 
> The exalted beauty (dare I say Whiteness?) of the religious services I
> talked about, or the lovely and moving Easter service at a New England
> church a respected lady told me about in a recent letter, could never
> have been completely captured by non-Whites, no matter what their
> creed. One thinks of Black churches and their very different, if no
> less sincere, ambience and spirituality.
> 
> But I sincerely believe that a similar religious feeling (dare I say
> spirit?), perhaps even purer, _was_ present in ancient Hellas when
> choirs sang forth in praise of Eos -- or when Pan or Freya were
> invoked in the forest temples of our other old homelands.
> 
> I do not advocate a return to the old religions -- far from it. But
> the key to our spirituality -- the key to what we are -- is within
> ourselves, and is therefore within our genes. It is not found in any
> specific creed, particularly not within a creed we inherited from
> other peoples, or one that can be adopted by anybody.
> 
> America's founders had a sense of a White identity which transcended
> religion. That's why they defined citizenship in racial terms in the
> Naturalization Act of 1790. That's why even those who opposed Black
> slavery -- like Francis Scott Key -- were supportive of the American
> Colonization Society which proposed to repatriate the freed Blacks to
> Africa. That's why Thomas Jefferson supported racial separation on a
> continental scale. Jefferson pointed out the great difference between
> slavery in America, where the slaves were Black, and slavery in
> ancient Rome, where the slaves were White: "Among the Romans,
> emancipation required but one effort. The slave when made free might
> mix with, without staining the blood of his master. But with us a
> second effort is necessary, unknown to history. When freed he is to be
> removed beyond the reach of mixture."
> 
> That sense of White racial identity was even promoted and advocated by
> no less than the President of the United States (Theodore Roosevelt)
> as late as the early years of the 20th century. He stated:
> 
> "Nineteenth-century democracy needs no more complete vindication for
> its existence than the fact that it has kept for the white race the
> best portions of the new worlds' surface, temperate America and
> Australia.
> 
> "Had these regions been under aristocratic governments, Chinese
> immigration would have been encouraged precisely as the slave trade is
> encouraged of necessity by any slave-holding oligarchy, and the result
> would in a few generations have been even more fatal to the white
> race; but the democracy, with the clear instinct of race selfishness,
> saw the race foe, and kept out the dangerous alien.
> 
> "The presence of the negro in our Southern States is a legacy from the
> time when we were ruled by a transoceanic aristocracy. The whole
> civilization of the future owes a debt of gratitude greater than can
> be expressed in words to that democratic policy which has kept the
> temperate zones of the new and the newest worlds a heritage for the
> white people." -- Memorial Edition of the Works of Theodore Roosevelt,
> XIV, 245, 246.
> 
> "If there is one question upon which the philanthropists of the
> present day, especially the more emotional ones, are agreed, it is
> that any law restricting Chinese immigration is an outrage; yet it
> seems incredible that any man of even moderate intelligence should not
> see that no greater calamity could now befall the United States than
> to have the Pacific slope filled up with a Mongolian population." --
> Memorial Edition of the Works of Theodore Roosevelt, VIII, 118
> 
> On the Texas war for independence from Mexico, Theodore Roosevelt
> said:
> 
> "Whatever might be the pretexts alleged for revolt, the real reasons
> were to be found in the deeply marked difference of race, and in the
> absolute unfitness of the Mexicans then to govern themselves, to say
> nothing of governing others." -- Memorial Edition of the Works of
> Theodore Roosevelt, VIII, 131
> 
> Theodore Roosevelt's virtue in having a strong racial consciousness
> was something he shared with America's founding fathers of the late
> 18th century. In a way he was a continuation of their legacy. He also
> embodied some of their flaws, such as a naive belief that
> representative government, miscalled "democracy" by TR, could cure all
> ills and somehow ensure wisdom. Another flaw -- a fatal flaw --
> possessed by both Teddy Roosevelt and the founders was the foolish
> belief that the Jews were, in essence, the same people as European
> Whites and differed only or mainly in their religion. In fact, Teddy
> Roosevelt once ridiculed an anti-Jewish preacher who came to New York
> when TR was police commissioner there. The Jews were, then as now,
> anxious to shut the preacher up and close down his speaking
> engagements. This Roosevelt refused to do, but he did employ a group
> of Jewish policemen to protect the clergyman.
> 
> The nine decades from the time of Theodore Roosevelt to the present
> have educated all of us on the utter folly of regarding the Jew as
> just a odd kind of White man with a peculiar religion vaguely related
> to our own. The Jew's open and aggressive promotion of everything
> which destroys our race, from non-White immigration to miscegenation
> to homosexuality have shown us that the Jewish survival strategy is
> one of destroying the racial integrity and consciousness of their host
> people. Whites must become racially conscious, and racially conscious
> Whites must never make the mistake of accepting Jews as White again.
> 
> We must regain a sense of racial consciousness, which is the heritage
> of the old America and the founders, and we must refine it with the
> lessons we have learned in the last century. We desperately need to
> regain that sense of identity again. It must not be based on beliefs,
> which can change in a moment or a decade and which allow the alien to
> claim to be one of us. It must be based not on what we believe, as
> important as that may be. It must be based on what we actually are.
> Only then can what we are -- our defining essence and the source of
> all that we create and love, and all that our descendants will create
> in love in the future -- survive and achieve its destiny.
> 
> Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on
> thinking free.
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
> Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books. It is
> distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADV-list.
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> 
> ==> To subscribe send an e-mail message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] The subject of the message should be:
> Subscribe
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> 
> To comment on this broadcast, please write to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To
> report typos and technical errors in ADV-list or our web site, please
> write to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> To contact us via "snail mail," write to:
>      National Vanguard Books
>      Attention:  ADVlist
>      P.O. Box 330
>      Hillsboro, WV  24946
> 
> The National Alliance:  http://www.natvan.com
>                         http://www.natall.com

It is obvious that the leadership of the environmental movement is
totally White. Just examine the Boards of Directors, etc. Notable by
their absence are the Jews.

tom