
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Len Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Rocketman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ...The only thing missing from existing > >solid-state portable recorders is an integrated portable-DAT-quality mic > >preamp. That's all that is needed for 99.9% of prosumer use. > > Add a Denecke AD-20 or our Mic2496 to a Nomad Jukebox 3 and you've > pretty much got what you want. If you want 24/96 capability, then > perhaps our PDAudio system would do the job for you. Len, I really am sorry to be picky, because your PDAudio CF solution is pretty darned slick, for it's intended purpose. It's definitely a boon to many users who need digital I/O for their PDA's. I'm glad to see that it is being received well. I just had a look at Pocco Software's PDAudio offering today. I hope the PDAudio and 24/96 do well for you. However, a multi-box portable recording solution isn't what I'm looking for. It impedes portability and hampers impromptu recording (too much to carry, too much to break, too much to manage, multiple batteries to check/charge, etc). It's also prohibitively expensive, since no mics are included, separate preamp, etc. If my only requirement were long battery life, built-in mics and high quality digital audio, but not pocket-sized form factor, I would just carry along my Sony Digital-8 camcorder, and use it to record sound. Problem solved. But that's not what I want. I want stealthy portability, ruggedness and a complete absence of tape and moving parts in a pocket-sized form factor. I don't think it's too much to ask, since it's far simpler than a MiniDisc recorder, and they're *tiny*, despite all of the moving parts and relatively large discs. SD cards are about 1/10th the size of a MiniDisc. The IC's needed to process AAC are also very tiny. Li-Ion "gumpack" batteries are teeny, but powerful. The itty-bitty components all exist, and are all incorporated into myriad consumer products; but none of those products meet my basic requirements for a high-quality portable recording device. It's amazing. How can that many manufacturers (especially the big Japanese companies like Sony) all collectively ignore amateur/prosumer digital recordists categorically, when those folks have lots of money to spend, and have proven that they will buy expensive gadgets to further their hobbies? I don't get it. What I need and want is a decent preamp (MD/DAT quality), 1/8" TRS stereo mic input, built-in mics (with windscreen option), manual record levels, AAC or WMA compression (+ straight PCM option) and removable Flash memory storage device. That's it. I could live without everything else, except maybe playback/review capability and basic track deletion (like a digital camera's built-in image deletion feature). I could rely upon a CF or SD card reader to transfer the recordings to a PC/Mac, and skip the USB feature. That would save a lot of engineering, and would help keep costs and size to a minimum. I figured that the little Panasonic electret condenser capsules that you use for your Core Sound stealth mics would be a great choice for the built-in stereo mics, since they're so inexpensive and sound so nice even before you tweak them. They would need to be shock-mounted to keep handling noise down. Is it clear what I'm asking for? It's really just a solid-state replacement for a basic tape recorder, with a singular purpose: To record high-quality stereo audio digitally. The CF or SD cards function like the cassettes and DAT's of yore. That's all I want. No need to go overboard with features. The encoding of a mic signal into some form of digital audio recording is the sole purpose of the unit. The rest is bells and whistles. The Mayah Flashman is on the right track; but went waaaay overboard on the features. Your Mic24/96 unit, with the addition of a CF slot and a processor to encode AAC, would be just exactly what I need. You might not even need an LCD display. I didn't have an LCD on my old cassette deck, and it worked just fine as I recall. Hope this stirs up some thoughts about future products. I really think what I'm asking for is what many recordists (and would-be recordists) are searching for. Think simplicity and integration, with a singular purpose. Cheers, -Barry
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |