
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Devil's Interval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The director says that if she is unhappy with the sound of any of the > footage they use we can re-record it in the park at a later time and they > can over-dub the new sound (it must be done in the park as opposed to a > studio to keep the genuine street sound.) Karen- Glad to hear things turned out okay with your daughter's outdoor performance. Sounds like you and her did the smart thing. I surely don't wish to second-guess her director, but we have often done outdoor shoots with indoor mixes substituted for the film soundtrack. The studio acoustics can be manipulated easily by the sound engineer to a suitable realistic ambience with eq, digital delay and other effects. The real trick is that we also record 'wild sound' at the scene outdoors of just location background noise (traffic, wind, dogs barking or whatever) and then we tastefully and subtly track that sound back into the background of the final mix. Most folks wouldn't believe that the final results were not recorded on-site. We have also produced 'live performance' audio-only projects where we needed a track or two from another performance at a later date to fill out an album. In this scenario, we take several minutes of non-musical background sound between numbers from the original performance location and save that audio as a precaution. If the mix from the subsequent 'live' recording(s) doesn't match the ambience of the main live session, we can get a near perfect seamless match by tracking in the saved background ambience with the new material. So, if your daughter feels she needs to redo her performance, it seems it might just as easily be done in a studio and tweaked with effects and added ambient sound from the location. One good sound engineer works cheaper than a whole location sound crew. :) -Turloch
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |