
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Interesting thread! It's nice to find some comradery around the enigmatic Gibson brand. My current all-time-favorite guitar is an old L-00 from, I figure, about the time FDR took office. I don't know any of you folks personally, but I sure wish I did. Steve and Gail hit it on the head, I think: "gibson guitars are very inconsistent...gems may be found from all periods" and "with all things Gibson, nothing is totally cut & dried". A repair person once quipped to me "anything goes with Gibson". I like that. All things being un-equal with Gibson, I have found that the type of strings used make an enormous difference. With a "regular brand" phosphor bronze set, my L-00 sounds like a cheap 70 year old guitar - strident tone and no real presence. With Thomastik AC-112 Plectrums, the sound is full, dry, and woody with plenty of punch on the low end. All that to say, in my opinion, that a guitar should be auditioned by the player in person and that one should be prepared to try several different types of strings before giving up on a particular Gibson guitar. Regarding the J-50 guitars, I have played several from the 1960s and 1950s. I doubt I have the same level of familiarity as others here, but as a general rule I have found the sound of the heavier ADJ bridge models to be "compressed", with a springy bass, and real nice for a certain type of vocal accompaniment. The lighter weight, 1950s I guess, guitars have more "bark" and a tighter, punchier bass which is maybe more suitable to string band playing. But, YMMV, of course. Much is in the hands of the picker. Coincidentally, I happen to be evaluating one of the guitars that an ealier poster mentioned! Small world. ----------------------------------------------------------- I don't read mail at the address in the header. old gibson at big foot dot com is a better choice. -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |