
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Ken Moore wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter T. Daniels > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > > > >Isn't it nice that you have Michael telling us that that interesting > >information was irrelevant? > > Irrelevant to whom? You'll have to ask Mr. Haslam why he considers the oral tradition irrelevant. > Clearly I have two things in common with MT, even > if we are at opposite ends of the spectrum of horn players: since he > actually raised the question with Pears, he is as interested as I am in > what notes to play, given notation that is ambiguous, and whether the > composer cares about the different choices. Some horn players consider > that Brain's choice, in Britten's presence, wraps the matter up; some > horn players, possibly not knowing the tradition but more likely > deciding to strike out on their own path, take a different > interpretation. BB was not averse to devising new notational devices. You'd think hed've done the same in this instance. -- Peter T. Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |