
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message >>How is the mono Kempff different from the stereo? In grand outlines. (Or >>in fussy detail, if you prefer. :) ) >> >>Lena > Principally it is in the sound. [...] >In the 1950s DG's mono sound captured this special sound to >perfection. Anyone who ever heard Kempff in the concert hall will > attest to the richness of the sound. [...] >In the early 1960s, when Kempff was starting a new Beethoven cycle >also for DG, it was in stereo. By then the DG engineers decided that >bass was a problem, so they practically eliminated it! As a result >Kempff sounds like a light-weight, something he most decidedly was >NOT. Thanks very much. That's interesting - I do think that bass is something of a problem on the stereo Kempff. (Though I think it's compounded by an interpretive decision to be 'light' in other ways, also.) Lena
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |