
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Dr.Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > John Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >"Dr.Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >> John Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >"Dr.Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> ><snip> > >> >> Sure! We can make digital recordings of the music--you can't > >> >> get much more modern than that! > >> > > >> >You can't get much more modern than 1970s technology? > >> > > >> > > >> >J > >> > > >> > >> What do you have in mind? > > > >Single atom bit storage. > > > >> Mp3's of digital recordings of them? > > > >1990s technology. > > > > > >J > > Why are you listening to music, then? Because I like it. > That's so 4000 years ago. I'm not opposed to antiquity. I'm just not confused about what is the most modern technology. J
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |