
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"goFab.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:38:32 -0500, in article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, BlackMonk stated: > > > > > >"poisoned rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Reading replies to this thread, I'm trying to figure out whether > >> either.... > >> > >> a) almost none of you have heard any new music since the '60s > >> b) you've heard music since the '60s, but don't like any of it (hence, > >> no "pleasures" of any sort) > >> c) you've heard music since the '60s and like some of it, but none of > >> those pleasures are guilt-inducing. > > > >I'll go with C. I don't feel guilty about liking anything. > > > > > > > Many here would probably go with (b), as we've seen in many prior threads in > rmb. The lament that "there's no good music anymore" (and hasn't been since the > 1960s) is all too familiar here. In the meantime, people have to look only as > far as the recent charts to find music that's just as good as anything from > those eras, demonstrating not only that good music is still being made but that > it's being recognized by the public. The huge hit "Stacy's Mom" is from an > album by Fountains of Wayne that, in terms of sheer pop song writing and > performance briliance, easily rivals the best work of the Beatles. Yet the > whining no doubt will continue. > I've only heard the hit. I wouldn't say it rivals the best work of the Beatles, but it's a good song. Not a million miles away from The Beatles musically, either.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |