
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
I wasn't trying to by searing or profound, I was sincerely looking for an answer. It's something that's intrigued me for a long time. I know of no other great band lacking a great drummer. "jenni carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Pray tell me, oh superior one, what shouldeth that "less than adequate" > drummer have played twix verse and chorus of LITSWD? Suggest you, perhaps, > a > parradiddly-aye-oh-to-billyo-aeolian-transbutonic-crossdressing-contorpian-m > utated-flimflam-flapjackery-doubleswitch-cutout ROLL? Sorry to get > tecknickal but it's hard for a mere mortal musician such as myself to fully > comprehend these searing insights which you have so humbly shared with your > inferiors. > marcuscp > "jack stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sorry for the intrusion, but this is something that has bothered me > > recently. It is a basic tenet of musicianship that you can't succeed > > without a tight rythm section. My estimation of the individual Beatles: > > John and Paul: unsurpassed geniuses of pop music, the likes of which we > > will never see. All pop music being made today will be lucky to write > > really insignificant footnotes to the work they did some thirty years ago. > > George Harrison: A near-great. Were he a member of a rival band, the > music > > press of his day would've made a serious case for his superiority to the > > Beatles, which would almost certainly have been corrected in our time, and > > for posterity. > > And then there's Ringo. > > THUD-THUD-THUD. That's this guy's transition from the intro to "Lucy > > in the Sky With Diamonds" into the chorus. No kidding! I hope that noone > > would rank his singing skills much higher either. > > Enough with the bashing. The question that haunts me is how a third > > rate singer and a fourth rate drummer got to be a significant part of the > > greatest pop band of all time? It just doesn't fit in my mind. > > If anything, I would like to think that this fact alone further > > reinforces my case for the divinity of Paul McCartney and John Lennon as > the > > two foremost pop geniuses of all time (rumors of their poor live > > performances notwithstanding). How can you be the greatest band with a > less > > than adequate drummer? > > > > "the bee tells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Great post. I'm surprised that JL played piano on "Maxwell's..." and > "Oh, > > > Darling." > > > > > > The notion of John being incompetent is absurd. > > -- > > > > All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated. > > If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup, > please > > change your headers appropriately. -- the moderators > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.518 / Virus Database: 316 - Release Date: 9/11/2003 > > > -- > > All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated. > If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup, please > change your headers appropriately. -- the moderators -- All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated. If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup, please change your headers appropriately. -- the moderators
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |