
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Stan (the Man) goes: >Alan Hope wrote: >> Bill Oliver goes: >>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>>Alan Hope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>I don't suppose you could find some needy family to give it to. No, of >>>>course, what was I thinking. Mocking those beliefs again. Tsk. >>>In fact, we contributed to the soup kitchen/meals on wheels program >>>our church has. But thanks for asking. >> No, thank you for trumpeting your charity from the rooftops. >> I'm delighted to hear it. Those lucky po'folks. Leftover turkey >> followed by pumpkin pieties. Yummy. >What a nasty little prick you are, Alan. First you accuse him of doing >nothing for a needy family (an unneccessary smack that had little to do >with the "discussion"). Then, when he responds to your unfounded >accusation, informing you that you're wrong, you accuse him of blowing >his own horn. Thanks for your book-report, Stan, updating me on my own posts. You don't seem to have missed anything crucial. >Why don't you give it a rest for awhile? Your rep is well-established. >All this additional crap is overkill. I'd love to oblige, of course, and post according to your, rather than my own, whim. But I feel in this case a lesson is needed: you can't always get what you want. Besides which, the "pumpkin pieties" line was too good to wait until next November. Nothing stands in the way of a good gag, Stan. Nothing. Not that you'd grasp that. -- AH
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |