
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Bill Oliver goes: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Alan Hope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Bill Oliver goes: >>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>>Alan Hope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>Bill Oliver goes: >>>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>>>>Alan Hope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>Bill Oliver goes: >>>>>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>>>>>>Davida Chazan - The Chocolate Lady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>>>(Learn to take a joke, you two!) >>>>>>>Know any good nigger jokes, Davida? >>>>>>Jesus, what a baby. If Saint Paul had been a snivelling wreck like >>>>>>you, you know, we wouldn't be having this conversation. >>>>>Actually, Paul was quite cognizant of bigots in his day as well, >>>>>and he wrote about them, too. The only difference is that >>>>>the anti-Christians of his day weren't quite as hypocritical >>>>>about it. >>>>And who's being hypocritical now? >>>Those who see nothing wrong with their bigoted >>>attitude about Christianity yet recoil at criticism >>>of any other faith and make a pretense of tolerance >>>because of it. >>>Look in the mirror. >>You'll have a cite for that, of course. >No problem. This in reply to my statement that mainstream >Islamic organizations should condemn extremist groups wrapping >themselves in the flag of Islam in the same manner that mainstream >Christian organizations condemn extremist groups claiming to be >Christian: > "You couldn't have chosen a better time to be alive, billo, for the >tide is certainly running in favour of you and your Islam-hating sort. >I'm glad, however, you've chosen to prosecute your crusade here in >Usenet, and in misc.writing in particular. Elsewhere, and some real >harm might have resulted from your blind hatred. In here, you're caged >and safe." All true, of course, and very well put, if I do say so myself. And the pretence of tolerance? Where was that again? -- AH
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |