Re: OT - Coulter

"trotsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> > "David Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>Giftzwerg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >
> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >
> >>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>I can give you one.  But I think its more fun to see if you have
> >>>>>
> > the
> >
> >>>>>>brains to figure out that revised draft laws are working their way
> >>>>>
> > through
> >
> >>>>>>the congress, and this time they include a provision to draft
> >>>>>
> > women.
> >
> >>>>>Cite?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Just to shut both of you assholes up:
> >>>>
> >>>><http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:s.00089:>
> >>>>
> >>>><http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.00163:>
> >>>
> >>>This is a *Democratic* bill, you colossal idiot.  How the fuck does a
> >>>silly little grandstand play by Charlie Rangel (D-NY) and Ernest
> >>>Hollings (D-SC) morph into *Bush's* plan to "draft women?"
> >>>
> >>>Only in the tortured mind of the leftist, eh?
> >>>
> >>><laughter>
> >>
> >>Hell, I think even all 13 co-sponsers of the House bill are Democrats.
> >>Boy, he does look stupid now - I guess we all know why he didn't want
> >>to provide a citation, huh?
> >
> >
> > The military has rejected any attempt to reinstate the draft, as they
have
> > plenty of volunteers, the caliber of which are excellent.
>
>
> Yeah, that explains why they had to dip into the Reserves.

That's why there *are* Reserves. (Duh.) The word itself should give you a
clue.


> And isn't
> the National Guard involved too?  Everything but the kitchen sink.

It would be surprising if it were not. The National Guard has been involved
to some extent in every major war for at least the last hundred years, I
think.

Neil