Re: KERCHING ! KenGestion

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
writes
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Al 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> > Seanie O'Kilfoyle wrote:
> >
> > > Londons 'Mare, Mad Ken Livingshite has just released predictably skewed
> > > *statistics* to herald the "Success" of CONgestion charging and excuse the
> > > lower than expected investment in public transport funding result
> > >
> > > Read through them for a good old giggle
> > >
> > > Spot the contradictions and win a major prize !
> > >
> > > 110,000 (already over taxed) mug punters a day are being hit for the
> > > *charge*
> > >
> > > £5:00 x 110,000 =  £550,000 per DAY !
> > >
> > > £550,000 x 5 days = £2.75 Million per WEEK !
> > >
> > > £2.75m x 52 weeks = £1.43 Billion per YEAR
> >
> > Your maths is fucked up, Clunesy!
> >
> > GBP-2,750,000 * 52 = GBP-143,000,000 not GBP-1,430,000,000
> >
> > I suggest you avoid visiting London for one day, and invest the fiver in a
> > new calculator.
> >
> > I also suggest you avoid visiting London a second day and invest that fiver
> > in me -- I spotted the contradictions AICMFP
> >
> > > ONLY £50 million to be "re-invested" in public transport
> >
> > I would indeed be interested in knowing where the other 83 million is going!
>
> To pay for the technology, people and equipment to make the system work.
>
> 3.4% return is the sort of number you'd expect after you've paid the 
> plc part of the partnership :(

So it's a good job it's 34%. D'oh.
--
Steve
  -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/B$ d++(-) s+:+ a+ C++ UL++ L+ P+ W++ N+++ K w--- O V
PS+++ PE- t+ 5++ X- R* tv+ b+++ DI++ G e h---- r+++ z++++
  ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------