Re: And the purpose of that section is.........

esenter wrote:

> Dale Eastman wrote:
>
> > Richard A. Macdonald wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Furniss v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-137
> > > "Petitioner’s reliance on section 861 likewise is misplaced. Petitioner
> > > reads section 861 to provide that items not defined therein are not 
> > > subject
> > > to tax. Section 861(a)(1) and (3) provides that interest from the United
> > > States and compensation for labor or personal services performed in the
> > > United States (with exceptions not applicable here) are items of gross
> > > income which shall be treated as income from sources within the United
> > > States. Nothing in section 861 operates to exclude from income any of
> > > petitioner’s receipts."
> >
> >
> >
> > Shove your inane tax court 'rulings' up your ass.
> > I will not be visiting that kangaroo court.
> > It will be a jury criminal court if at all.
> >
> > You know, just like Kuglin.
>
>
>
> Well, you had better study what the meaning of "willfulness" is because 
> it is an element of most tax crimes.
>
> You can make an honest mistake on your tax calculations, which is a 
> defense, but disagreements with the law is not a defense.  Since you 
> have indicated that the courts are "corrupt", you have shown nothing but 
> defiance toward the tax laws and will surely be convicted.

Ooooo, Your threats vis-à-vis the corrupt courts have me quaking in my 
shoes.... Not.

Ed, You too can shove the inane tax court 'rulings' up your ass.