Re: Mr. Macdonald your "support your position using solely the IRC argument" is done.

Richard A. Macdonald wrote:

> "Dale Eastman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Richard Macdonald wrote:
> >
> >
> > > "OnryAnRkst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Richard Macdonald wrote,
> > > >
> > > > > It has everything to do with your Army Pension.
> > > >
> > > > What does Section 863 have to do with that?
> > >
> > >
> > > It is the provision of the 861 series that it falls under.
> >
> > Bill, Give 'im a half a point on this one.
> >
> > 863 does 'catch' items of income that are not enumerated in 861(a) or
> > 862(a). It doesn't affect the end result regarding dee two triple eye
> > though.
>
>
> Why do you assert that 1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii) taxes income that is exempted by
> Fundamental Law, the Secretary or even Congress does not have that
> authority, it is unconstitutional.
>
> 1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii)(A) In the case of a foreign taxpayer (including a
> foreign sales corporation (FSC)) computing its effectively connected income,
> gross income (whether domestic or foreign source) which is not effectively
> connected to the conduct of a United States trade or business;
>
> Is the taxation of Foreign Sourced Income of Foreign Taxpayers
> UNCONSTITUTIONAL?
>
> Yes or NO.

The short answer is to ask you if the constitution applies to non-U.S. 
citizens?

The long answer will take some time, since I have to re-find all the 
stuff I read when Mr. Rubin attempted to make this an issue.