Re: And the purpose of that section is.........

Arthur L. Rubin wrote:

> Dale Eastman wrote:
>
>
>
> > You are either for tyranny or you are against it.
> > I am taking this crusade just a seriously as the criminality of the
> > government necessitates.
>
>
> I'm against tyranny.  I cannot imagine anyone honestly
> believing that the income tax is tyranny.  Unjust, yes.
> Morally wrong, yes.  Tyranny, no.

Mr. Rubin, You are an intelligent man. You just have a problem with 
thinking outside of 'your' box.

You just can not believe that it could be as Larken et al. claim.
That would make it one massive fraud.

The government refuses to answer 6 questions. The courts refuse to look 
at the words of law, even going so far as to allow the DOJ representing 
the IRS to get away with contempt of court.


The IRS illegally raids a citizen's home on a fishing expedition, that 
continues to this day, looking for information that Mr. Rose has 
presented upfront and to the point for what, 6 years. He has been asking 
the government for six years to "show him, using the law, where his 
position is in error".

In that same raid the IRS illegally steals 150 videos in violation of 
the First and Fourth amendment.

It is the government's actions, the actions of certain 'professionals' 
in this group, as well as the plain text readings of the regulations 
that drive the anti-tyrannists.

As I said, You are either for tyranny or you are against it.

====================================
From:
http://www.reasons2vote.com/transcript.html

Page 3

18             MR. EVANS:  Also, simultaneously with
19        filing my motion for summary judgment, I submitted a
20        list of 10 interrogatories which I included in my
21        certificate of service.  And, to date, those
22        interrogatories have also not yet been responded to.

23                  THE COURT:  I’ll see he answers the
24        interrogatories.  We will know the reason why.

Page 5

19               Along the lines of the interrogatories,
20        I would like to file a motion for an order to compel a
21        response to the interrogatories.

22                 THE COURT:  I’ll take care of that today.
23        You can leave that here.  Put it up on the desk.

Pages 33, 34

19                THE COURT:  Did you get the
20        interrogatories?

21                                MR. CARROLL:  I did, your Honor.

22                 THE COURT:  Will you answer them, please,
23        if you can.

24                 MR. CARROLL:  Yes, although all of them,
25        excuse me, I have a cold today.  All of them require
1          really legal answers.  So I’ll respond to them.