
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
trudogg wrote: > Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>...I have no problem with "attacks" on Nancy Reagan, she's more than capable of > >>defending herself. But I didn't see the show and can't comment specifically on > >>what was portrayed... > > > >Seldom do I ever watch this kind of stuff. I got the feeling that to > >much editing was done. I would like to see the un-cut version. > > ...not having seen it, I can only rely on the word of others. But it sounded > like they put together a collection of cheap shots. How your suppose to give a detailed story of Reagans career in a few hour show and have it accurate is beyond me, especially when the goal is to entertain John Q. Public. > > > -- > http://trudogg.dyndns.org > news://news.trudogg.dyndns.org
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |