
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Jerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Old Salt, > > Maybe you can help explain something to me. The classic > Democrat/liberal position seems to be that the other side > Republican/conservative group is pro-big business to the > detriment of the poor. This is an often repeated complaint, > that Bush or whoever is in office at the time is giving breaks > to business or to the "rich". > > Then, another position by the same group is that the > conservatives have failed because of a business climate that > kills job growth. The "no jobs" position. > > My question is how can these two positions be reconciled? > Isn't it business that produces jobs? I know that an increasing > number of jobs are produced by the government, but what > does the government produce? Who makes the shoes, TV sets, > cars, or whatever if not business? So if a policy is pro-business, > isn't it also pro-jobs and pro-production of goods? Is the main > differentiation big business versus small business? That may help > explain the apparent dichotomy. > > Jerry Questions like this exhibit why a liberal talk radio show will never fly. The left's statements often *sound* good at first, but a when asked to defend or reconcile their positions, they can't. At least not with any logic, reason, or reality. B
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |