Re: webelieveher.com

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael Snyder  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>But note that 99.9% of those newspapers did NOT report
>>>>>HER NAME.  
>>>>
>>>>No, just where to find it. 
>>>
>>>You could have stopped after the word "No".  The argument's over.
>>>Faber's identity was protected (however imperfectly), and Bryant's
>>>was not, ever, at all.  Period.
>> 
>> Sure, if I had a problem with telling the whole truth. 
>
>ROFLMAO.  You?  Problem with the whole truth?  When you are
>trying to pretend that Faber's identity WAS NOT PROTECTED?

You still don't see the irony in that assertion, do you?