Re: webelieveher.com

tjab wrote in message ...
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Michael Snyder  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>tjab wrote:

>> > The usenet attacks on Faber began as  early as July 16.
>>
>>The State of Colorado continues to protect Faber's name
>>to the present day, as do a fair number of journalists.
>
>The practical effect of which is nil.

1) No it isn't, and 2) we weren't arguing the practical effect,
we were arguing whether one received protection and the
other did not.  Faber received protection of her identity.
Bryant did not.  If we WERE discussing the practical effect,
we would note that Faber's name has been MUCH LESS
in the public press than Bryant's.  I would estimate less than
one percent.





>
>>NOBODY protected Kobe Bryant's name, EVER.
>
>>> As I said, neither has had their privacy protected,
>>
>>Then you continue to lie in the face of the obvious.
>
>I'm not the one who was talking about six months when the
>reality was two weeks, nor am I the one who snipped the
>fact that Faber's home phone number has been published on
>the web and Bryant's hasn't.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>