Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Misc Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Woman charged for falsely accusing Lions receiver of rape



Michael Snyder wrote:
Child wrote:

Michael Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Child wrote:

"Michael Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Child wrote:


"Bateau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message


The point is that the increase in CHILD support payments were for
the mother and did not benefit the child at all.


we are speaking of one case with a manipulative woman, a lawywer,
for goodness sake.


How come when it goes against your preconceptions, it's always
some kind of fluke that doesn't mean anything significant?



How come the guy who says he understands statistics thinks that one case of one woman making unreasonable demands, which she lost, is in any way significant?


How come the gal who claims to be even-minded about these things
thinks that, just because one case was mentioned specifically,
it must be the only case that exists?




Don't be obtuse.

The claim made by those presenting the case is that it shows that child support is intended entirely for the mother.


Don't be a liar.  The claim made by those presenting the case is
that it is AN EXAMPLE of child support being intended for the mother.

Feminists invented "absentee child support" in the middle of the 19th century for the purpose of allowing women to break up their marriage, take the kids, and still force men to support THEM. It took feminists almost a century to make so-called "child support" into the law that everyone "knows" to be "just the way it is." But the lies of feminism are just lies. The radical feminist social experiment in "absentee child support" has destroyed millions of families and hurt millions of children. It needs to be ended ASAP.


Bob





> Do you or do you not


believe that this case proves that?


I believe that it is an example of that.






<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.