
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Banty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >One person's irritation is another person's normal activity. One person's >'reasonable request' is another person's unlivable restriction. These things >get ironed out normally by informal negotiation - THEN if necessary it's up to >the law. Both of which are completely undermined when someone thinks they can >kill to fix their problems. It's also completely undermined when one side or the other has effective control of the law. Or the law is simply not interested in handling the problem for reasons of its own. Then what do you suggest? -- Matthew T. Russotto [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |