
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Kevin Karplus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, beeswing wrote: > > I posted this question in the financial aid thread, but I'd really like to > > discuss it further. Could anyone please give me some input on this? > > > ><< If one can (potentially, maybe) pay for instate, public university education > > *OR* private school (especially at the critical middle-school level), how da > > heck does one decide, anyway. Either? Both, with the hope of a windfall? What > > makes the biggest difference to the character of a growing girl? >> > > I don't know about "character", but a public university education is a > far better educational investment than a private middle school. Here's why I asked the question I asked. Although the school we are considering is much better academically than our public, urban middle school, I really *am* concerned about "character" -- self-image, self-confidence, personal integrity, and the ability to steer clear of peer pressure (i.e., that my daughter be strong enough to own choices on sex, drugs, and so forth). The school we're considering is much different from the environment of our public middle school. It is an all-girls school whose mission is to train "future world leaders" -- in whatever way those future leaders might choose to run with it. Some of the parents and a few of the girls spoke at the school's open house. The parents were enthusiastic about how their daughters had grown and changed; they also talked about how engaged the kids were in the school and in education. The girls were poised, confident, well-spoken, and very positive about the school. I think of the middle school period as "formative years" -- in the best and worst senses possible. I believe they can make or break who you turn out to be, especially in the case of girls. College, which I also consider essential, doesn't carry quite the same weight on a girl's personality and esteem. The foundation for those, I believe, has largely been formed before a girl reaches college age. > If I remember right, you are in ..., where going to private > schools is highly fashionable (over 1/3 of all students do), but there > are still decent public schools available. My daughter currently attends public school, where she is a gifted class. I already know which junior high my daughter would be going to. Even though it lays claim to the gifted program, it's basically in name rather than in practice. Plus, it's very urban, with all the pluses and minuses that entails -- and maybe I'm off base, but I perceive a lot of minuses. With all its drawbacks, I consider the school the best the district has to offer me. That's the scary part. >Far better to go to a > decent public school and have enough money to afford 4+ years of > university than to go to a ritzy middle school and then only be able > to afford an AA degree. True. The issue wouldn't be that she *wouldn't* go to four years of college, though, it's more that she might have a smaller range of choices. And she might have to creatively finance part it herself. (An academic scholarship would be nice, for example. Or maybe she'd have to take a student loan for a portion of the tuition.) Either way, whether or not her middle school is "ritzy" doesn't even weigh into the issue. beeswing
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |